Read in between the lines. Get a magnifier and try to read something in between those narrow lines. Read below the line, read above the line, and ultimately read under the line. What ever may be jugglery there is something to read which is not written. Unsung heroes, unsaid thoughts, unwritten stories, all can be undone if one wishes to unwrap the unholy "un"". But how to see a thing which is not there? Or apprehend one hidden beneath? It is one simple indication that world is not straight, either in terms of expressionist or receiver. Expressions can be dressed up with harmless embellishments to escape a potential danger.
Many of the legal decisions are drawn from perplexing legal lexicons. More and more decisions appear to be in perfect syn with your ability to contrive the terminology, than with the facts. A High court can not acquit and as well punish a person simultaneously if the decisions were to be given on facts. For instance provisions look silly to me like multiple murders can not make one more sinner than one murder. One cannot be trailed twice for the same offence. If the justice so fragile how safe it is to the human being? It is high time that we give a thought about the usable language in the legal corridors.
Regular "I want to spread peace and love in the world" by Miss world can be read (pay me millions, I will be your ambassador of good will) . Mentor cum judge in reality show chest bangs with tall promise "You are going to sing in my next film" ( strictly between us, I am badly in search of one). Bush's "Weapons of mass destruction" can be read ( I want oil). Zardari's "Stateless actors" can be read (State sponsored actors). The lone surviving terrorist Kasab "He is not found in our data base" ( Data base? Sounds weird. It does not exist in my country?). Same Zardari announcements like "The proof provided by India is not admissible in any court of law" ( The court of law has any thing to do in strategic affairs?). "we are equal victims of terrorism" ( reap as you sow).
Far more crispy lessons to tickle your funny bone, state prescribed text book to 2Nd class in Pakistan reads " India was part of Pakistan" ( Hozzart? Re write the history. Any way many pre independence born citizens are kicking their buckets) , many more poison spilling lessons inducted into class books. "Catch them young" policy strictly adhered to. "Hindus in corroboration with British wanted to destroy Muslims" reads 5Th class reader. Set the mind in the right direction during budding stage, later Indian missiles with name "Pruthvi" can be countered with Pakistan "Ghori" missile ( Pruthvi was misread to be Pruthvi Raj Chowhan by them ) Ghori was followed by "Ghajni" ( both famed for their successive defeats followed by clemency by Indian kings and finally victorious after 11 and 17 attempts ) by their young scientists, taking vital nutrition of hatred against India during the childhood.
Imagine Talibans, LeT, and Al qaida fighting for Pakistan, one already offered it's willingness. Out lawed can turn patriotic if ideologies seemed similar on a long run. You can buy a suicide bomber in your neighbouring country to settle your scores with any one. You want to find nuclear technology in gray market? Wait for some time. You can negotiate a small bomb to annihilate your next town old enemy. Macabre at it's best is in store for us in bundles. Face it or perish.
Has any body guessed that India, mother of all the civilizations can also ring a death knell to the human history, through it's erroneous long parted son? Breeding ground turned grave yard. Mother turned terminator. So grievous to name, but unavoidably to be christened so.
No comments:
Post a Comment